apparently random bug in durus
2010-06-21
Alex Hall2010-06-21
Binger David2010-06-21
Alex Hall2010-06-22
Binger David2010-06-22
Alex Hall2010-06-25
Binger David2010-06-25
Alex Hall2010-06-25
Binger David2010-06-25
Alex Hall2010-06-28
Neil Schemenauer2010-06-28
Binger David2010-06-28
Neil Schemenauer2010-06-28
Michael Watkins2010-06-29
Binger David2010-06-29
Neil SchemenauerPython 2.7+ (Re: apparently random bug in durus)
2010-06-29
Neil Schemenauer2010-06-29
Michael Watkins2010-06-28
Alex Hall2010-06-28
Neil Schemenauer2010-06-29
Neil Schemenauer2010-06-29
Binger David2010-06-29
Alex Hall2010-06-29
Binger David2010-06-29
Alex Hall2010-06-29
Binger David2010-06-30
Alex Hall2010-06-30
Alex Hall2010-06-30
Binger David2010-06-30
Alex Hall2010-06-30
Binger David2010-07-01
Alex Hallapparently random bug in durus
Binger David
I would like this idea fine if we were not still running most of our sites on 2.4. It will still be a while before we are ready to leave 2.4 behind. It seems we could guard against this particular problem by adding something to the durus/__init__.py It does seem odd, though, to write code to detect broken installations, On Jun 28, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Michael Watkins wrote: > On Mon, June 28, 2010 14:48, Neil Schemenauer wrote: >> Ah, implicit relative import bites us. I wonder if it would be time >> to switch to using absolute imports. i.e, add >> >> from __future__ import absolute_import >> >> to the Durus modules. That would make Durus depend on Python 2.5. > > Never having once used relative imports in all these years, +1 from me. > Running 2.6.x and 3.1.x or higher these days.