OODB basics
2005-10-08
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-08
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
David Binger2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
David Binger2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
David Binger2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
mario ruggierOODB vs SQL
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
John Miller2005-10-09
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-12
mario ruggier2005-10-09
David Binger2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-10
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra2005-10-10
David Binger2005-10-11
mario ruggier2005-10-11
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra2005-10-11
A.M. Kuchling2005-10-11
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra2005-10-11
Roger E. Masse2005-10-11
Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra2005-10-11
Roger E. MasseRe: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins2005-10-11
Michael Watkins2005-10-11
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-11
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-11
David Binger2005-10-11
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-15
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-12
Michael Watkins2005-10-12
Patrick K. O'Brien2005-10-12
mario ruggier2005-10-12
Michael Watkins2005-10-12
Patrick K. O'BrienDemo application [was: Re: [Durus-users] Re: OODB vs SQL]
2005-10-13
mario ruggier2005-10-12
Patrick K. O'BrienRe: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins2005-10-11
Rodrigo Dias Arruda SenraDurus basics
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-09
David BingerRe: OODB basics
2005-10-13
Oleg BroytmannOODB basics
Oleg Broytmann
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:10:48PM -0400, David Binger wrote:
> The volume of data that is loaded when you load an instance can be
> managed
> by moving bigger (non-key-ish) data into sub-instances. For
> representing email
> messages, for instance, you might keep subject and sender in a
> persistent instance
> with all of the other data in a sub-instance. This is essentially
> the same thing
> as having separate information-rich keys, but it may be easier to
> manage.
[skip]
> I mean a Persistent instance has a direct reference to another
> Persistant instance,
> without going through any application-level index. If the situation
> requires following
> chains of several references to get to the object of interest, then
> that is indeed what
> I mean.
Thank you! I have to spend some time comprehending all this. And before
I fully grok it I will ask more questions, related to Python, pickle,
Durus, persistance...
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd@phd.pp.ru
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.