On Oct 9, 2005, at 3:00 PM, mario ruggier wrote:

> dismiss it as a baby zodb

How can we address this?

Although Durus has every feature I think it needs,
the feature list is shorter than zodb, and the
performance will probably always be similar, unless
somebody figures out a faster way to do file io.
Although everybody says simplicity is good,
it isn't simplicity that sells.

Maybe projects like schevo and moellus are just
the ticket.  And if Oleg gives OODBs a try, this
thing may really take off. ;)