durusmail: durus-users: Re: OODB vs SQL
OODB basics
2005-10-08
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
mario ruggier
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-11
mario ruggier
2005-10-12
Matthew Scott
Re: OODB basics
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
OODB vs SQL
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-10
Michael Watkins
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-10
Michael Watkins
OT: Durus
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
David Binger
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
John Miller
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-10
David Binger
2005-10-11
mario ruggier
2005-10-11
A.M. Kuchling
2005-10-11
Roger E. Masse
2005-10-11
Roger E. Masse
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
2005-10-11
David Binger
2005-10-12
Michael Watkins
2005-10-12
mario ruggier
2005-10-12
Michael Watkins
Demo application [was: Re: [Durus-users] Re: OODB vs SQL]
2005-10-13
mario ruggier
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
Durus basics
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-10
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-10
David Binger
2005-10-10
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
David Binger
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
mario ruggier
Re: OODB basics
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
Re: OODB vs SQL
Michael Watkins
* Michael Watkins wrote [2005-10-11 14:35:00 -0700]:

> Yet in Postgres (and experience tells me Oracle would have been no different)
> the "solution" was workable enough. Clearly they are doing some things at the
> file IO level that go beyond simply opening up a big file.

as I read what I wrote its probably more likely memory based caching at the
server side that I noted.

Question for the group: what's the largest number of objects you've worked
with using Durus or ZODB?

I smell a diversion coming on...


reply