durusmail: durus-users: OODB basics
OODB basics
2005-10-08
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
mario ruggier
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-11
mario ruggier
2005-10-12
Matthew Scott
Re: OODB basics
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
OODB vs SQL
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-10
Michael Watkins
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-10
Michael Watkins
OT: Durus
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
David Binger
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
John Miller
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-10
David Binger
2005-10-11
mario ruggier
2005-10-11
A.M. Kuchling
2005-10-11
Roger E. Masse
2005-10-11
Roger E. Masse
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
2005-10-11
David Binger
2005-10-12
Michael Watkins
2005-10-12
mario ruggier
2005-10-12
Michael Watkins
Demo application [was: Re: [Durus-users] Re: OODB vs SQL]
2005-10-13
mario ruggier
Re: OODB vs SQL
2005-10-11
Michael Watkins
Durus basics
2005-10-09
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-09
David Binger
2005-10-10
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-10
David Binger
2005-10-10
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
David Binger
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-13
mario ruggier
Re: OODB basics
2005-10-13
Oleg Broytmann
OODB basics
Matthew Scott
On 10/11/05, Patrick K. O'Brien  wrote:
> I think there are other application domains that would do a better job
> of showing pure database functionality than this one.  How about a
> simple ToDo manager?  Or maybe one of the more mature SQL products has
> an example application that we could rewrite as an OODB app?

At the moment, it seems that some of the up-and-coming Schevo apps
being written will have at least components of them that will be
released as GPL.  So a "real world" app using Schevo (and implicitly,
Durus) that people can see/feel/use is just around the corner. :)

--
Matthew R. Scott
reply