durusmail: quixote-users: Popularity of Quixote
Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-17
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-17
Titus Brown
Re: Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-18
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-19
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
Titus Brown
ANN: TURBOZCHERRYPLORAILS
2005-10-19
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
mario ruggier
2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-22
Ian Bicking
2005-10-22
Michael Watkins
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-25
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-25
Matt Patterson
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-25
mario ruggier
2005-10-25
Titus Brown
2005-10-25
Titus Brown
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-26
m
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Paul Moore
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Paul Moore
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Ian Bicking
2005-10-27
Mike Orr
DateTime quoting in psycopg
2005-10-28
Oleg Broytmann
Popularity of Quixote
william@opensource4you.com
I would use Quixote for more "professionals" applications. But I'm facing
issue with the Quixote popularity.

As you know, often, people that don't know the bits and bytes of an
application evaluate it based on his community size.

But if I summarize the context of Quixote, we can find
- a wiki
- writings (check those of Mike Orr)
- documentation (check those from Titus Brown, Dave Kuhlman, ...)
- well known site suing it (LWN.net)
- a mailing list

Thus the means are there to meet more Python users/developers, no ?

On top of that Quixote is existing since long time (compared to Cherrypy2
for example), has proven a good stability.

Thus what's missing for Quixote to have a bigger community size ?


Thanks.

PS:
If you think that the community size is big enough. Then I would
appreciate how you can convince a customer for your Quixote application
compared to other (f.e. Zope, Cherrypy, ...)




--
William: http://www.opensource4you.com

reply