Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-16
william@opensource4you.com2005-10-17
Graham Fawcett2005-10-17
Titus BrownRe: Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-18
Michael Watkins2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett2005-10-19
Michael Watkins2005-10-19
Titus Brown2005-10-22
Ian Bicking2005-10-22
Michael Watkins2005-10-25
Mike Orr2005-10-25
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-25
Matt Patterson2005-10-25
Mike Orr2005-10-25
mario ruggier2005-10-26
Shalabh Chaturvedi2005-10-26
m2005-10-27
Shalabh Chaturvedi2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-27
Paul Moore2005-10-27
Oleg BroytmannPopularity of Quixote
william@opensource4you.com
I would use Quixote for more "professionals" applications. But I'm facing issue with the Quixote popularity. As you know, often, people that don't know the bits and bytes of an application evaluate it based on his community size. But if I summarize the context of Quixote, we can find - a wiki - writings (check those of Mike Orr) - documentation (check those from Titus Brown, Dave Kuhlman, ...) - well known site suing it (LWN.net) - a mailing list Thus the means are there to meet more Python users/developers, no ? On top of that Quixote is existing since long time (compared to Cherrypy2 for example), has proven a good stability. Thus what's missing for Quixote to have a bigger community size ? Thanks. PS: If you think that the community size is big enough. Then I would appreciate how you can convince a customer for your Quixote application compared to other (f.e. Zope, Cherrypy, ...) -- William: http://www.opensource4you.com