durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Popularity of Quixote
Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-17
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-17
Titus Brown
Re: Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-18
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-19
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
Titus Brown
ANN: TURBOZCHERRYPLORAILS
2005-10-19
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
mario ruggier
2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett
2005-10-22
Ian Bicking
2005-10-22
Michael Watkins
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-25
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-25
Matt Patterson
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-25
mario ruggier
2005-10-25
Titus Brown
2005-10-25
Titus Brown
2005-10-25
Mike Orr
2005-10-26
m
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Paul Moore
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Paul Moore
2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann
2005-10-27
Ian Bicking
2005-10-27
Mike Orr
DateTime quoting in psycopg
2005-10-28
Oleg Broytmann
Re: Popularity of Quixote
Michael Watkins
* Graham Fawcett wrote [2005-10-19 09:16:00 -0400]:

> Quixote doesn't need to be uber-popular in order to survive. Just as
> many of us choose to use Medusa, in spite of Twisted being the current
> poster child for Python networking, Quixote will maintain an audience
> just by remaining simple and excellent. But it's realistic to expect
> diminished growth in the Quixote community unless something sexy and
> Quixote-powered draws attention back toward it.

Simple and excellent but quiet isn't such a bad thing.

Its great these other frameworks are raising the profile level of Python
itself; no doubt some developers new to the language will shop around and be
attracted to Quixote, or other solid frameworks not currently at the top of
Google's page rank, on their style and internals not just popularity.

Ultimately all roads lead to the same place, sooner or later the web
framework chooser needs to sit down and write applications...

reply