Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-16
william@opensource4you.com2005-10-17
Graham Fawcett2005-10-17
Titus BrownRe: Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-18
Michael Watkins2005-10-19
Graham Fawcett2005-10-19
Michael Watkins2005-10-19
Titus Brown2005-10-22
Ian Bicking2005-10-22
Michael Watkins2005-10-25
Mike Orr2005-10-25
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-25
Matt Patterson2005-10-25
Mike Orr2005-10-25
mario ruggier2005-10-26
Shalabh Chaturvedi2005-10-26
m2005-10-27
Shalabh Chaturvedi2005-10-27
Oleg Broytmann2005-10-27
Paul Moore2005-10-27
Oleg BroytmannRe: Popularity of Quixote
Michael Watkins
* Graham Fawcett wrote [2005-10-19 09:16:00 -0400]: > Quixote doesn't need to be uber-popular in order to survive. Just as > many of us choose to use Medusa, in spite of Twisted being the current > poster child for Python networking, Quixote will maintain an audience > just by remaining simple and excellent. But it's realistic to expect > diminished growth in the Quixote community unless something sexy and > Quixote-powered draws attention back toward it. Simple and excellent but quiet isn't such a bad thing. Its great these other frameworks are raising the profile level of Python itself; no doubt some developers new to the language will shop around and be attracted to Quixote, or other solid frameworks not currently at the top of Google's page rank, on their style and internals not just popularity. Ultimately all roads lead to the same place, sooner or later the web framework chooser needs to sit down and write applications...