durusmail: quixote-users: Quixote, QP, the future...?
upload binary file
2006-03-07
Tom Lesters
2006-03-08
Mike Orr
upload binary file/current state of quixote
2006-03-08
Bo Yang
Re: upload binary file/current state of quixote
2006-03-08
mario ruggier
2006-03-08
David Binger
2006-03-09
Bo Yang
2006-03-08
Mike Orr
Quixote, QP, the future...?
2006-03-08
Titus Brown
2006-03-09
David Binger
2006-03-09
Graham Fawcett
2006-03-09
Graham Fawcett
2006-03-09
David Binger
2006-03-09
Mike Orr
2006-03-09
David Binger
2006-03-09
Bo Yang
2006-03-09
Bo Yang
Quixote, QP, the future...?
Graham Fawcett
On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote:

> There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect
> to compatibility.  The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which
> does not run on Windows.


But the protocol doesn't require forking, right? It's an implementation
detail. Writing a less-efficient but stable-and-semantically-equivalent
SCGI implementation for win32 shouldn't be a total show-stopper, just a
fun weekend challenge for someone. :-).

Graham

(Oh, and +1, still using Quixote on a daily basis, it's bread and butter
for me.)

reply