On 3/9/06, David Binger  wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
>
> > On 3/9/2006 10:19 AM, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> >
> >> On 3/8/2006 8:59 PM, David Binger wrote:
> >>
> >>> There isn't any difference between QP and Quixote with respect
> >>> to compatibility.  The scgi server used by both uses passfd, which
> >>> does not run on Windows.
> >>
> >> But the protocol doesn't require *forking*, right? It's an
> >> implementation detail. Writing a less-efficient but stable-and-
> >> semantically-equivalent SCGI implementation for win32 shouldn't be
> >> a total show-stopper, just a fun weekend challenge for someone. :-).
> >
> >
> > Oops, replace 'forking' with 'passfd'.  Still true, n'est-ce pas?
>
>
> Right.  Any volunteers?

This would be a synchronious server then or a multithreaded server?

--
Mike Orr 
(mso@oz.net address is semi-reliable)


--
Mike Orr 
(mso@oz.net address is semi-reliable)