* Sells, Fred wrote [2006-10-21 14:18:45 -0400]:
> Will QP run with Python 2.3???

One likely problem area can be found in qp.lib.spec - specifications are very
handy, and recently spec gained support for the "set" type. No doubt you could
work around it, or customize your QP with an older version of the spec module.
Sorry, can't remember if there are any 2.4 requirements beyond that but no
doubt someone will step in clue us in.

The spec module is handy and feels very natural to use plus also leads to
cleaner readable and more reliable code through fairly dramatic reduction of
tedious type checking and initialization code.

The combo of Durus (plain ol' Python) plus qp.lib.spec I have found has

> 2. I've been using SQLObject, and found it programmer friendly.  Does
> anyone have a comparison of SQLObject to DURUS without starting a flame war
> ;).  It's just that with deadline pressure, I'm short on time to evaluate
> too many different permutations and combinations.

In addition to anything else that's been written, I have found that losing
SQL's query language is much less painful than I expected.

If you do need or want to continue down the SQL path, SQL Alchemy also seems
to be getting a lot of mind share these days, even among former SQLObject
users.