[mems-talk] SU-8 adhesion

Nicolas Duarte nbd110 at psu.edu
Sat Nov 18 16:00:03 EST 2006


You might want to consider using an oxygen plasma to improve 
adhesion.  I have not done this with SU-8 but I have had adhesion 
problems with other photoresists were solved by doing this.  A simple 
ashing procedure for less than 5 minutes should be enough.

As for why this happens, I have heard many explanations.  The two 
most likely ones are that 1) Ashing produces a minute surface 
roughness that improves adhesion and 2) Oxygen ions are imbedded into 
the the first few nanometers of the substrate that react with the 
photoresist when it coats the wafer, improving adhesion.

While reason 1 is more likely, I have never noticed any surface 
roughness produced by ashing (but then again I haven't done any 
before/after SEMs of wafers I have ashed).  Either way, it works with 
shipley photoresists and should help you out.

Nicolas Duarte
Penn State University
PhD Student in Electrical Engineering

At 3:05 PM -0500 11/18/06, Bin Wang wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Recently we met a problem on SU-8 adhesion. After a typical SU-8
>process, the ENTIRE SU-8 film peeled off ALL AT ONCE from the Si
>substrate when we developed it. We have dehydrated at 200C for 20
>min before coating. For prebake and PEB, we tried both standard
>length of time and the time 50% longer than the standard, but
>neither worked. Could anyone help me crack this issue? Thanks a
>lot.
>
>Additional info: Wafer cleaned in Nanostrip for 3 hrs before
>dehydration. SU-8 2050 spinned at 2500rpm. We used standard
>exposure time, standard developer and IPA rinsing.


More information about the MEMS-talk mailing list