[mems-talk] SU-8 2100 layer thicker than expected
Brubaker Chad
C.Brubaker at EVGroup.com
Wed Nov 29 13:00:22 EST 2006
Gareth,
SU-8 2000 materials have a bit of temperature sensitivity when it comes to the material viscosity - this is more pronounced with the higher solids content materials such as SU-8 2100 (which is, I think, somewhere around 77% solids).
If your clean room is a bit on the cold side (20ºC vs. 24ºC, for instance) this could have an impact. I wouldn't expect just a temperature variation to cause the film thickness difference you are seeing, but it may contribute.
Other contributors may be things such as exhaust, use/lack of use of a covered coat module, completeness of soft-bake...
Best Regards,
Chad Brubaker
EV Group invent * innovate * implement
Technology - Tel: 480.727.9635, Fax: 480.727.9700 e-mail: c.brubaker at EVGroup.com, www.EVGroup.com
-----Original Message-----
From: mems-talk-bounces at memsnet.org [mailto:mems-talk-bounces at memsnet.org] On Behalf Of Gareth Jenkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:33 AM
To: General MEMS discussion
Subject: [mems-talk] SU-8 2100 layer thicker than expected
Hi
When spinning SU-8 2100 (at 1000rpm) I consistently get thicker than
expected layers. According to the datasheets, I should get 260um but I
get around 400um or more instead.
I am using silicon as a substrate and everything else is fine - I have
good adhesion and uniformity.
It's not a huge issue as I can always increase the speed but it seems
odd to have such a big variation. My SU-8 is quite old so perhaps I have
lost some solvent from it?
More information about the MEMS-talk
mailing list