-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 28/04/10 03:15, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> Is anyone interested in a concurrent Durus server?

I am.

I have private code (I can't share) where the durus server is
multithread and able to paralelize some (not all) actions, like reads.
This was a paid development for a private organization, managing
currently about 300TB of data. The storage support distributed
transactions and multiple databases.

Another change is that a durus cache miss can (optionally) generate an
exception, to do progress in other threads (sharing the same cache)
while the miss is fetched in background.

I can not share code, but I can say that those improvements make a huge
difference, they were "easy", and I would love to have those
improvements in stock Durus. When I talk about Durus with colleagues
those are the backpoints, and I can't share my code :-(.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea@jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
..                              _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQCVAwUBTCINZ5lgi5GaxT1NAQKSaAP/W22DaF1opPwcUtPcHeRmZDYa8H8fMa0h
nJ33GA5VzTHebozqciFymEAHH006u1w+R3+bFN+IX/uXQAdQAc/mkKrFPZHzw44q
Sb0a/8oSaE5rJKM80+VfVz+vUZmJv+6lUkE5ISTyaRyPdHNj9dhghwlYspwLM2hA
8E9s5pwENXI=
=WB6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----