durusmail: durus-users: snag with btree.get(key)
snag with btree.get(key)
2005-07-07
2005-07-07
2005-07-07
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-11
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
Schevo and moellus [was: Re: [Durus-users] snag with btree.get(key)]
2005-07-11
Re: Schevo and moellus [was: Re: [Durus-users] snag with btree.get(key)]
2005-07-13
2005-07-14
2005-07-14
2005-07-14
2005-07-13
2005-07-07
snag with btree.get(key)
Peter Wilkinson
2005-07-14
On 14/07/2005, at 9:38 AM, Peter Fein wrote:

> I could have used something like this.  I was working on a
> prototype and
> knew it might need to move to an RDBMS some day - would have been nice
> to build on a framework that anticipated that, while retaining the
> rapid
> development benefits of Python.
>
> I've been moving to production quality environment (backed by a
> RDBMS) &
> the conversion's sometimes painful...

This is interesting to hear. I'm looking at going the other way, the
dataset isn't huge and the OO/relational mismatch is increasingly
making me grumpy (the most polite way I can put it).

Can I ask for more info on why you are looking to move from Durus,
not suggesting that you shouldn't just curious?

--
Regards,
Peter Wilkinson.

reply