durusmail: durus-users: snag with btree.get(key)
snag with btree.get(key)
2005-07-07
2005-07-07
2005-07-07
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-11
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
2005-07-08
Schevo and moellus [was: Re: [Durus-users] snag with btree.get(key)]
2005-07-11
Re: Schevo and moellus [was: Re: [Durus-users] snag with btree.get(key)]
2005-07-13
2005-07-14
2005-07-14
2005-07-14
2005-07-13
2005-07-07
snag with btree.get(key)
Peter Fein
2005-07-14
Peter Wilkinson wrote:
>
> On 14/07/2005, at 9:38 AM, Peter Fein wrote:
>
>> I could have used something like this.  I was working on a  prototype and
>> knew it might need to move to an RDBMS some day - would have been nice
>> to build on a framework that anticipated that, while retaining the  rapid
>> development benefits of Python.
>>
>> I've been moving to production quality environment (backed by a  RDBMS) &
>> the conversion's sometimes painful...
>
>
> This is interesting to hear. I'm looking at going the other way, the
> dataset isn't huge and the OO/relational mismatch is increasingly
> making me grumpy (the most polite way I can put it).
>
> Can I ask for more info on why you are looking to move from Durus,  not
> suggesting that you shouldn't just curious?

Scalability.  We've got a lot of data & pretty serious indexing needs.

--
Peter Fein                 pfein@pobox.com                 773-575-0694

Basically, if you're not a utopianist, you're a schmuck. -J. Feldman
reply