durusmail: durus-users: Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
Trivial doc/interface fix
2006-03-13
Re: Trivial doc/interface fix
2006-03-13
2006-03-13
A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-13
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-13
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
2006-03-13
2006-03-21
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
Peter Fein
2006-03-14
Peter Wilkinson wrote:
>
> On 14/03/2006, at 9:18 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:
>
>> I have several small issues, nevertheless. For example, objects come to
>> the storage engine already serialized. I would rather prefer to do the
>> serialization myself. I don't need, for example, to keep the first eight
>> bytes of the object in the database, since that is the OID and I already
>> have the OID as the database key.
>
> I'll second this, my previous email makes note of the same thing,
> different reasons but basically the same need.

Third, if I understand correctly.
reply