-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Binger wrote:
> Here, when we use gen_oid_record() it is in an update script, and
> we do not commit in the middle of the iteration.  I think changing the
> index while iterating over the index is not supported.

OK. So, are you committing a massive transaction at the end?. Remember
that I'm talking about a multimillion object storage.

Now I support the same semantic in my backend storage.

I humble think that this sort of things (also "do not keep object
references between transactions", the detailed table of object
conflicts, etc) need to be documented.

I can volunteer, if you don't mind to discuss the "undefined" behaviours
in this list.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea@argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
                               _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBREU9G5lgi5GaxT1NAQK9JAP+I1x8Ae2CIBIsjIJZVQQYlCabIo9YZj5i
ydL5sJZo3pKwZxRq0OQ+vFeAVcjs2w3vfUFwUdexHxBI5GyhfriM7zJsSnGuVuBF
IgJ6v1i8jfyJJJ8kuu6HH66sbGS42JZiI8BlUy0oSOoQR0pPlGRzBCcYgClTcvnG
iz/WUDnf9B8=
=UX5O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----