-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Binger wrote:
> Can't ssh be used to provide this kind of functionality with a much
> higher level
> of security?

I can't trust my users.

> Why is it that you only want to use one port?

Because my durus server would be a SERVER, like Mysql or Apache, useable
for my clients. The service would be accesable via a "well-known" port,
with database/user/password authentication. Since each user have its own
independent database, and each database run in its own thread, I don't
mind if the user DoS (Denial of Service) herself, delete its own
objects, etc.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea@argo.es http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea@jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
                               _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRGr/XZlgi5GaxT1NAQLplQQAm/wlq6pKi60limP2HyrctdHucZTZGqI+
J7cmUHXb4q9ZugevuZ0JnYvLa+GTw9zQNtxpcgAnrkjG5Z5xi/mPWfJCXLR3q6kM
j0bCkmnC1vMWN3W94mHTAtmIpBmxhV3rFhki4DqouCT2Rvqk02jVxN0UDHCmXWRm
gjwdZJgXHYQ=
=mnRk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----