durusmail: durus-users: Re: Possible bug in cache code: Re: [Durus-users] Doubt about cache and ghost objects
Doubt about cache and ghost objects
2006-05-24
2006-05-25
Possible bug in cache code: Re: [Durus-users] Doubt about cache and ghost objects
2006-05-25
Re: Possible bug in cache code: Re: [Durus-users] Doubt about cache and ghost objects
2006-05-25
2006-05-26
Re: Possible bug in cache code: Re: [Durus-users] Doubt about cache and ghost objects
2006-05-25
Re: Possible bug in cache code: Re: [Durus-users] Doubt about cache and ghost objects
David Binger
2006-05-25
On May 25, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:

> When reaching this code, "current" is ALWAYS bigger than
> "self.size". So
> the "min()" always gives a negative number, so the "max()"always gives
> "current/64". That is, slice_size is ALWAYS "current/64".

Good catch.  I checked in the correction.

reply