A.M. Kuchling kirjoitti:
> Going to lunch the other day, I was thinking about the content of such
> a talk.  I thought it might start by contrasting the SQL approach (run
> a query and process the resulting output) with the very Pythonic OO
> approach (create a bunch of objects, modify them, commit them).  But
> most ORMs also try to provide a Pythonic-looking interface.  Should
>

I started to wonder about the opposite direction: pickles. I wonder how
many Python programmers are familiar with them from before? For me that
ease of serialization was kind of a revelation early on - 'whoa i can
save my apps complex state this easily, in a small file that loads quickly!'

ODBs are not exactly pickling, but there is perhaps something similar,
so possibly it is another technology (besides SQL) to refer to when
introducing Durus. Just a thought that came to mind, did not think too
much of it yet, dunno if it makes sense.

btw the Durus-using Schevo project has some advocacy articles about ODBs
that might have interesting points to bring up.

> --amk
>

~Toni