durusmail: mems-talk: Photoresist Coating Methods
Photoresist Coating Methods
1997-08-18
1997-09-18
Photoresist Coating Methods
BAGEN@aol.com
1997-09-18
To:  Dhaval Shah

Per your request, below is a description of various coating methods currently
used in microelectronic fabrication.  If you would prefer to receive this
text in a file format such as Word, please let me know.

I received a considerable number of inquiries for information regarding
alternative coating
methods, so I have written a general summary shown below.  Should you require
any
further information, such as names of specific equipment vendors or
assistance running
coating evaluations, please feel free to contact me again.  I am an
independent consultant in the field of microelectronics processing and work
with a wide range of applications including semiconductors, multichip
modules, flat panel displays and printed circuit boards.

Best Regards,
Susan Bagen, P.E.
Advanced Process Concepts
(972) 527-5028 Phone
(972) 517-7928 Fax


SUMMARY OF COATING METHODS
A question was posted on the Internet regarding a precision coating method
that would
yield good coverage into deep features.  The following is a general response
to this issue.

Adequate flow of a coating material into high aspect ratio features is
dependent on several different factors:
1) Coating method.
2) Surface cleanliness and preparation - relates to wetting and flow of the
coating solution.
3) Coating solution:  viscosity, solvent system, wetting, surface tension
(leveling agents).

COATING METHODS:  The coating methods considered here are typically capable
of
achieving high degrees of uniformity (+/- 2-5%) on flat, planar surfaces.
 Depending on
the method used, coatings over deep topographical features can often be more
planarized than conformal due to the flow of material into deep trenches.
 Thus, the total thickness variation in the film can be greater than that
achieved on smooth surfaces.  Below is a discussion of some of the current
coating techniques used in the microelectronics industry.

1)  Spin Coating:  Spin coating can be used successfully for coating high
degrees of
topography if programmed appropriately.  In a standard spin coat process, the
resist
material is puddled onto the center of the substrate, then spun at a high rpm
to spread it
over the substrate surface.  When the substrate has deep topographical
features, several factors work against a continuous coating.  First, the high
rpm promotes rapid drying of the resist solution, therefore, not allowing
flow of the material into deep trenches.  Secondly, the features themselves
cause a physical obstruction to the solution flow, preventing incomplete
coverage and often causing striations.  Variations on the spin coating
technique, however, can help to overcome these issues.   A closed-bowl
configuration and/or programming slow acceleration and spin speeds help to
reduce the evaporation rate of the solvent in the coating solution.  This
allows time for the solution to flow and spread prior to drying which sets
the film.  Variations on the dispense method to first deposit the solution
over the entire substrate prior to spinning also greatly helps.  This
technique also allows for fluid flow prior to drying the film.  Programming
the dispense arm to travel the radius of the substrate while the substrate is
slowly rotated is one way to achieve this.  A pause after the dispense step
allows additional time for the solution to flow into the deep features.  The
subsequent spin step then achieves the desired thickness uniformity and
promotes drying of the film to set it in place.

2) Spray Coating:  Some spray coating systems are capable of producing highly
uniform
coatings of thicknesses ranging from less than 1000 Angstroms to greater than
100
microns.  In the spray coating process, there is direct perpendicular
impingement of the
coating solution that promotes coverage into deep trenches.  For thicker
films, the
solutions used in spray coating are often diluted as compared to solutions
used to achieve a similar spin-coated film thickness.  A reciprocating spray
nozzle coats the substrate in multiple passes to buildup the total desired
film thickness.  This lower solution viscosity may facilitate fluid flow into
deep features.  In addition, the degree of atomization during spray is set to
control how "wet" the coating is deposited onto the substrate, thus
controlling the subsequent flow of the solution once deposited and prior to
bake.

3) Meniscus Coating:  In this process, a substrate is inverted and passed
over a laminar
flow of coating material.  The result is highly uniform coatings, even on
substrates with
relatively poor flatness.  The degree of coverage into deep topographical
features is likely dependent on surface wettability.  This aspect of the
coating process has yet to be thoroughly evaluated.

4) Roller, Curtain and Extrusion Coating:  These are all variations of
directly applying the
coating solution across the topside of the substrate.  There is no forced
drying during
coating other than evaporation, therefore, the coating material has time to
flow and
planarize over surface features.  The degree of coverage into deep features
is highly
dependent on the surface wettability and the solution viscosity.

5) Plasma-Deposited Photoresist:  Ionic Systems, Inc. manufacturers a unique
plasma-
deposited photoresist system.  This system is only capable of depositing
relatively thin
coatings (< 0.5 microns), but the coatings are very conformal over
topography.
Depending on the intended use of the resist, the thinner coatings may be more
than
adequate.  E.g., the photoresist material used in this process has a very
high selectivity (> 300:1) in chlorinated etch chemistries.

6) Electrophoretic (electrodeposited) Photoresist:  This type of photoresist
has typically
only been used in the printed circuit board industry.  Both positive and
negative resist
chemistries are available.  Typical coating thicknesses are in the range of 5
- 10 microns, but specific resist systems can be deposited up to about 35
microns.  Electrophoretic resist films tend to be conformal over features.
 The coating process performance over very high aspect ratio features,
however, has not been fully characterized.

SURFACE CLEANLINESS AND PREPARATION
Regardless of which coating method is used, the wettability of the coating
solution to the substrate surface is key to the flow of the coating solution
into deep topography.  The surface must be free of contaminants that would
inhibit wetting and adhesion of the
coating material.  The type of contaminants present are dependent on the
prior processing of the substrate.  E.g., substrates which have previously
undergone plasma processing with fluorinated gases are prone to
fluorine-containing contaminants on the processed surface.  These
contaminants can form from reactions with photoresists or other organic
materials, and can pose significant problems with wetting and adhesion of
subsequent layers.  Adequate stripping/cleaning operations (such as solvent,
acid or oxygen plasma treatments) prior to subsequent coatings are essential.
 In addition, dehydration bake operations to remove surface moisture can
greatly improve adhesion and surface wettability.  Adhesion promoter
solutions should be used where appropriate.

PHOTORESIST COMPOSITION
There are often options available regarding a photoresist's solvent system,
viscosity, and
additives (surfactants, leveling agents, etc.).  Discuss this with your
photoresist
manufacturer and ask them to supply you with several different formulations
to try.  Often the addition or omission of an additive, or a change in the
primary solvent carrier can greatly affect the surface tension and
wettability of a photoresist solution.  If you are
currently working with a very high solids content, high viscosity solution to
achieve thick
coatings, you may want to consider using a diluted solution and accomplish
the total
thickness through multiple coats.  The lower viscosity may flow better into
high aspect
ratio features, and is also less susceptible to entrapping air bubbles which
may cause voids.


reply