I've seen similar effects with two different metals exposed during an etch. (In one case, a contact to Au made Cr etch much faster.) I believe that you are seeing a galvanic effect in which the more noble metal (Au) results in the less noble metal (Ni) being etched faster than it would alone. This is listed in Part I of the etching papers along with many other possible reasons for etch-rate variation. One solution might be to make another mask to cover the plated nickel, oversized for each feature by a few microns. During etching, only gold is exposed. This of course leaves a ring of nickel, which you may not be able to tolerate. Another solution is ion milling. --Kirt Williams ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sven Holmström"To: "General MEMS discussion" Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 4:03 AM Subject: [mems-talk] Au-etchant attacking plated nickel > Dear all, > > We selectively plate nickel onto gold coated silicon wafers. Later we etch > the gold using standard gold etch (Aldrich, Potassium Iodide etchant). We > have sometimes problem with the gold etchant etching also the nickel. > According to data sheets and literature KI is not supposed to etch nickel > (for example Etch Rates for Micromachining Processing—Part II by > Williams, > Gupta and Wasilik.). > > The keyword is 'sometimes'. The behaviour is very erratic. We have > produced > several nice pieces without any problems, but then at some times the > nickel > is etched even faster than the gold! (the nickel etch also in general seem > uneven, etching from the sides in concentric half circles rather than > evenly). It seems to us like the nickel etching is mainly depending on the > individual nickel baths. We use all the time standard Nickel Sulphamate > baths, but since we mix them by hand slightly individual differences are > unavoidable. The concentric half circles also to tend to point to > contaminations being a problem. > > I wonder if anyone else has encountered this problem and in which > direction > we should go to get control of the process.