Resist adhesion failure during develop is a symptom of severe resist adhesion failure. Something is really wrong. There are multiple factors to consider in this problem. 0. Is your process working as you intend it? That is, is the hotplate in the vapor prime step at the correct temperature, are the heating elements defunct? Is the HMDS really getting to the vapor prime chamber? In short, look at every element in your HMDS application to see if the equipment is broken, heater off, a line crimped, HMDS bottle empty (it happens!), heaters broken, vacuum not pumping down, something where your process isn't happening. 1. What was your prior chemical step? If it was an HF or Buffered Oxide Etch or some flouride chemical step, you need to immerse your wafers in sulfuric peroxide with heat. I would say 50 deg. C or more will do. HMDS won't overcome the issues with a surface that has been exposed to a solution with flouride. A 400 deg. C furnace step will work also, but this is probably not compatible with your process. Regular oven bakes won't work. The symptom with flouride adhesion problems can also be that it works sometimes and doesn't others. And phosphoric acid won't substitute for sulfuric peroxide. In the world of MEMS, there might be other solutions that defeat adhesion. 2. Also, is your surface clean prior to application of HMDS? There are three parts to this. A. Your wafers are dirty from prior solution used, or storage, etc. Make sure they are clean. Perhaps a peroxide clean if they are delicate, or a sulfuric peroxide clean if they can take it. O2 plasma should help if it is organic, do nothing if it is salts or some other inorganic crud. B. Vapor contamination. I had a case where wafers waiting for positive resist spin sat on a table next to a negative resist developer that was poorly exhausted and not isolated from the positive resist wafers that were waiting for resist spin. The Xylene from the negative resist developer track provided one or two molecular layers and defeated the resist adhesion of HMDS. We fixed the exhaust and isolated the negative resist track and resist adhesion was fine. Spilled machine oils do have a vapor pressure. Other operations can supply contamination. Poorly exhausted plasma etchers, are another. O2 plasma should take care of aromatic and aliphatic vapors though. On the other hand, you might be contaminating them after the O2 Plasma step. Vapor contamination is quick! C. If your prior step was a solvent immersion or some other chemical, you might have a few monomolecular layers of contamination. A solvent might be very pure, but you only need a few molecular layers of crud to not have good adhesion. However, O2 plasma should take care of aliphatic and aromatic vapors. HOWEVER, it won't take care of salts, inorganic crude, or some inorganic-organic junk. 3. Was the HMDS applied through a vapor prime process with the wafers heated, vapor applied? If the HMDS is applied as a liquid dispensed and spun off, you need to make sure the wafers are well baked afterwards to make sure the HMDS on the surfact reacts and the surplus is evaporated off the wafers. This method isn't used much anymore but I personally solved a resist adhesion problem this way. You might think you are baking the wafers, but check that your IR ovens are working if that is your bake method. A hot plate could work also. 4. You don't say what your substrate is, but it could be that the developer is attacking the substrate or the surface of the substrate. Developer is alkali. 5. Of course make sure that you have an adequate softbake. To fail adhesion in this case you would have to be fairly under softbaked. However, with some MEMS topologies the resist next to the substrate might not be very solid. Or you need a 110 deg. C softbake to relax the resist. I don't think this is your problem, but this is what some people believe, I have always doubted the idea of relaxing the resist with softbake. But try softbakes changes, the worse that can happen is a little wasted time. 6. I don't think they supply HMDS diluted anymore. Make sure the HMDS is 100% in the bottle. 7. For non-silicon substrates there might be some other phenomenon going on. The surface might oxidize and the oxide is readily soluable in developer. An plastic might have plasticizers bleeding out. If you do try some other adhesion agent, apply it by vapor and make sure it doesn't make your substrates look awful. Ed Sebesta Semiconductor & MEMS Process Engineer -----Original Message----- From: mems-talk-bounces@memsnet.org [mailto:mems-talk-bounces@memsnet.org] On Behalf Of Andrea Mazzolari Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 3:48 PM To: General MEMS discussion Subject: [mems-talk] improve photoresist adhesion Hi All, I need to deposit a photoresist of thickness about 5um, and pattern it in order to relize structures of lateral sizes 4x1000um. I tried using AZ9260 photoresist, but i had adhesion problems after development step. I used HMDS as adhesion promoter. I also tried to use a O2 plasma before photoresist spinning, but it did not helped. Any suggestions to improve photoresist adhesion ? Best regards, Andrea