Hi Dean, I appreciate the feedback. That's an interesting approach that I hadn't thought of. I was planning to align to a pattern underneath. It sounds like what you're proposing would be a more uniform array of lenses, if I am understanding you. The surface already does have a topography to it, and this would probably be an ideal approach for a proof of concept. Do you think this could be repeatable? Any experience with the suggested chemical? Thanks guys for your feedback, Alasdair -----Original Message----- From: Dean Hopkins [mailto:dean-hopkins@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 12:04 PM To: mems-talk@memsnet.org Subject: Re: [mems-talk] Microlens array You wrote: Hello folks, I am looking for a way to make fairly thick microlenses on a patterned silicon wafer. The end result I'm hoping to achieve is an array of hemispherical lenses with a diameter on the order of 20um (though it would be nice to go even thicker as well if needed). The lens needs to be transparent in the visible spectrum (~ 400-800 nm). Ideally, I'd like to use glass/PMMA/PDMS, but am open to suggestions. I've read of groups using photoresist reflow / grayscale lithography to create the lens shape. The profile is then transferred to an underlying layer by RIE. However, I don't know of any suitable material I could deposit with the desired thickness (for example, I am limited to ~7um of SiO2). Is there anything suitable that I could put down and etch anisotropically? I have an ECR etcher (plumbed with SF6 and O2) and an RIE (CHF3/O2) at my disposal. Would it be easier to follow the molding approach that people seem to be using. (Creating a master and replicating in PDMS). In this case, I was hoping my mask aligner could be used for aligning/shaping the lens material.. Once in contact, I could give it a UV flood exposure. Does this sound feasible or do I need to apply heat at the same time for any decent molds? Anyone have any experience making something similar? Thanks, Alasdair Here's a crazy idea: Cover the surface with a layer of 20µm glass beads, and reflow just enough to get them to slump together into a single mass, but not enough to self level. One source might be: http://www.thermo.com/com/cda/landingpage/0,10255,1865,00.html or you might try Scotchlite beads, IIRC they are a very high index glass. I'd reflow under vacuum to prevent trapping air at the glass/silicon interface. You'd need to adjust the time and temperature for best results. You could probably even control the microlens placement with etched pits or walls. Hope this helps, Dean Hopkins MEMS process engineer Silicon Valley, USA (408) 426-0501