Hi Alasdair, I haven't deliberately reflowed bulk glass onto silicon wafers. I know from bitter experience that it can be done, and that the resulting surface retains most of the original surface features. Once the process is tuned in (I'd start with long times at temperatures only slightly above the softening point) it should be repeatable. BUT as Josh pointed out, at some point if the features are small enough, surface tension will overwhelm any topography. Perhaps something more like depositing a thin layer of BPSG before applying the glass beads, and only heating enough to reflow the BPSG, but not melt or soften the beads would work? This might even work better as the lenses remain more-or- less optically isolated for less crosstalk. Probably lower surface stresses as well, since the lens array isn't a solid surface, and thermal expansion is broken up into short segments rather than a single long path... Hope this helps, Dean Dean A. Hopkins, Jr. MEMS Process Engineer Silicon Valley, USA (408) 429-0501 -----Original Message----- Reflow method can be very helpful for creating microlenses. See "Variable Focusing Microlens Chip for Potential Sensing Applications" from IEEE Sensors Journal VOL. 7, NO. 1, JANUARY 2007. The array has been made. The only problem I see is how small lens it can create. Less than 100 um probably is a problem. UV curable adhesive is more difficult to handle than photoresist. I am glad to see more application from it. Cheers, Josh-----Original Message----- From: Alasdair Rankin [mailto:arankin@groupivsemi.com] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 6:08 AM To: 'General MEMS discussion' Subject: Re: [mems-talk] Microlens array Hi Dean, I appreciate the feedback. That's an interesting approach that I hadn't thought of. I was planning to align to a pattern underneath. It sounds like what you're proposing would be a more uniform array of lenses, if I am understanding you. The surface already does have a topography to it, and this would probably be an ideal approach for a proof of concept. Do you think this could be repeatable? Any experience with the suggested chemical? Thanks guys for your feedback, Alasdair