I've experienced similar issues using lor 3a which was way past it's shelf life. In the end, a fresh bottle solved all the issues. Gabriel > On Jul 14, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Joshua Wellswrote: > > Thanks for the input. Unfortunately we are limited to using microdev > developer for this process due to material compatibility. We are also not > using an automated developing system. I have done quite a few experiments > using different bake times and temperatures and have also found that higher > temperatures at longer times works best. The biggest issue we are seeing is > small LOR dots in the exposed area that will not develop away. They appear > random and vary in thickness. Some of the features are smaller and these > "dots" cause the device to be rendered unusable after metallization. > > Joshua > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:52 AM, André Bödecker < > aboedecker@imsas.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > >> We had also problems while using an automatic developing device. The >> undercut depends among other things on the abrasive effect of the spraying >> direction of the developer tool. We made better experience with manual >> developing in a petri dish and always using fresh developer. >> >> André >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: mems-talk-bounces+aboedecker=imsas.uni-bremen.de@memsnet.org >> [mailto:mems-talk-bounces+aboedecker=imsas.uni-bremen.de@memsnet.org] Im >> Auftrag von Joshua Wells >> Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juli 2015 13:43 >> An: mems-talk@memsnet.org >> Betreff: [mems-talk] Liftoff Process Using LOR 10B and 1800 Series Resist >> >> I am trying to develop a repeatable liftoff process using LOR10B and an >> 1800 series positive resist for use with 1:1 microdev developer (necessary >> for material compatibility). The trouble arises in the repeatability of the >> process. Time of development varies significantly between runs with no >> process parameters changing yielding far too much undercut for our >> application. We have the LOR thinner and have by trying to work with that >> as >> well as full thickness LOR. >> >> Does anyone have a repeatable process or suggestions? >> >> >> Joshua >> _______________________________________________ >> Hosted by the MEMS and Nanotechnology Exchange, the country's leading >> provider of MEMS and Nanotechnology design and fabrication services. >> Visit us at http://www.mems-exchange.org >> >> Want to advertise to this community? See http://www.memsnet.org >> >> To unsubscribe: >> http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hosted by the MEMS and Nanotechnology Exchange, the country's leading >> provider of MEMS and Nanotechnology design and fabrication services. >> Visit us at http://www.mems-exchange.org >> >> Want to advertise to this community? See http://www.memsnet.org >> >> To unsubscribe: >> http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk > _______________________________________________ > Hosted by the MEMS and Nanotechnology Exchange, the country's leading > provider of MEMS and Nanotechnology design and fabrication services. > Visit us at http://www.mems-exchange.org > > Want to advertise to this community? See http://www.memsnet.org > > To unsubscribe: > http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk _______________________________________________ Hosted by the MEMS and Nanotechnology Exchange, the country's leading provider of MEMS and Nanotechnology design and fabrication services. Visit us at http://www.mems-exchange.org Want to advertise to this community? See http://www.memsnet.org To unsubscribe: http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk