durusmail: qp: Twisted - Was: Re: Quixote, QP, the future...?
Twisted - Was: Re: Quixote, QP, the future...?
2006-04-09
2006-04-09
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-10
2006-04-12
2006-04-12
2006-04-13
2006-04-13
2006-04-13
2006-04-13
2006-04-14
2006-04-14
2006-04-15
2006-04-16
2006-04-16
Twisted - Was: Re: Quixote, QP, the future...?
David Binger
2006-04-10
On Apr 9, 2006, at 11:08 PM, David K. Hess wrote:
> It seems that the porting effort would be minimal. However, the
> desire to reuse the start_durus method in the Site class makes me
> wonder if it shouldn't have tighter integration there; maybe a
> subclass with an overridden start_web method?

Maybe.  It seems like one might want different web server setups for
different sites.  Maybe Site.start_web() should just be changed to
call a
run_web() method on the site's publisher.  In the case of a twisted
site, I think the run_web() could just setup and start the reactor.






reply