On 28/06/2006, at 6:23 AM, David Binger wrote:

> Your publisher can implement the customized part.

As an aside I should mention so I don't sound like I'm totally
unhappy with QP and Durus decisions, is that the level of
customisation through subclassing that can be done simpy with QP is
far beyond any of the other web frameworks in Python that we've
tried. Although some cut and paste leads to duplicated code actually
being able to do things is wonderful, whenever I hear people
promoting 'full stack' frameworks these days I get a little nervous.
Out of possible interest the other things we've done are replace
get_sites so we can have the sites living anywhere we like and
replace interaction to use IPython rather than pyrepl since we are
used to it. QP is certainly very malleable.

Peter W