On 20 November 2002, Gene Christian said:
> The problem I encountered occurred while using LRWP, which seems to handle
> the PATH_INFO and SCRIPT_NAME variables differently.  My patch worked when
> running through LRWP, but would have broken cgi scripts (not good).

Oops, I missed that detail on re-reading your message.  Just as well I
didn't check the patch in I guess.

> To effectively use LRWP would require building a much more robust server
> (something like the SCGI server).  A handler script could then be written to
> make the changes to the PATH_INFO and SCRIPT_NAME variables.  The
> quixote_handler in the SCGI package does something similar.

OK, I guess the Xitami+LRWP+Quixote combo will have to wait until
someone who really wants it comes along and makes it work.  Thanks for
the info!

        Greg
--
Greg Ward - software developer                gward@mems-exchange.org
MEMS Exchange                            http://www.mems-exchange.org