durusmail: quixote-users: Evaluating quixote
Evaluating quixote
2002-12-30
2002-12-30
2002-12-30
2003-01-05
2002-12-30
2003-01-03
2003-01-03
Evaluating quixote
Greg Ward
2003-01-03
On 30 December 2002, Tom Jenkins said:
> How's the performance?  I didn't see any reports.  Oh what is everyone
> using as the adapters: SCGI, FastCGI, mod_python, other?

Oh yeah: obviously, we use SCGI.  Of the three realistic options for
Quixote (CGI is the fourth option, but it's only useful for debugging),
SCGI scores highest on the "Keep It Simple, Stupid" chart.

The obvious downside to SCGI is that it's Yet Another small/simple FCGI
replacement, so there's only the one implementation so far, only works
with Apache and Python, etc.  Hasn't stopped us.  ;-)

        Greg

reply