durusmail: quixote-users: SCGI vs. mod_python
RFC: SCGI graceful restart
2003-02-20
SCGI vs. mod_python (was RFC: SCGI graceful restart)
2003-02-20
SCGI vs. mod_python (was RFC: SCGI graceful restart)
SCGI vs. mod_python (was RFC: SCGI graceful restart)
2003-02-20
2003-02-20
SCGI vs. mod_python
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-03-01
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
2003-02-21
Re: RFC: SCGI graceful restart
2003-02-20
SCGI vs. mod_python
Nicola Larosa
2003-02-21
> psycopg has worked well for me.  PoPy and PygreSQL both gave me trouble

Then there's the license angle to be taken care of, at least for those of us
who do not have the freedom to release under GPL the code we work on.

While PsycoPG and PoPy are released under the GPL, both PygreSQL (the oldest
one) and pyPgSQL (the newest one) have a liberal, BSD-like license, similar
to those of Python and PostgreSQL.

Apart from the known technical ones, the license is an important reason for
choosing which RDBMS to use in proprietary projects. It is unfeasible to use
MySQL (unless you are willing to pay for an alternative license); it would
be foolish to stick a GPL layer in the middle of BSD-like licensed
components, when there are alternatives.


--
"I occasionally find myself chuckling to myself while I code
[in Python], because it all fits together so beautifully."
   Nick Vargish

Nicola Larosa - nico@tekNico.net


reply