> I was quite excited about it until I looked at the license:  not open
> source...  (if you do open source, you can use and redistribute it
> freely (like in beer) but if you do s.th. commercial, you need to get
> a commercial license--or so it seems to me).  What a pity!

I just took a look - it looks like a free license to me.  The "commercial
license" referred to gets you out of the requirement to distribute source,
but I see nothing there that says you *have* to buy a commercial license
for money-making use.

jon