durusmail: quixote-users: Drop support for Python 2.1?
Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-29
2003-10-29
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Re: Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
2003-10-30
Doesnt Quixote like CSS?
2003-11-01
2003-11-01
2003-11-04
2003-10-29
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-29
Drop support for Python 2.1?
Jeff Bauer
2003-10-29
> Subclassing builtin types is only supported in Python >= 2.2.
> I'm wondering how many people would be affected if we dropped
> support for Python 2.1?

+1

We're still using Python 2.1 in certain areas, where supported
libraries for newer Python releases has only recently emerged.

But we're not using Quixote in production applications, only
internal stuff. So it's not a big deal.  I think the current
version of Quixote is stable enough to fork off the next
release to 2.2+.  Please just provide a stable link to the
pre-2.2 versions and document it as such.

The benefits of subclassing StringType outweighs the costs,
assuming Erik and I can continue to use older versions of
Quixote over the foreseeable future.  Erik?

Jeff Bauer
Rubicon Research

reply