durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-29
2003-10-29
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Re: Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
2003-10-30
Doesnt Quixote like CSS?
2003-11-01
2003-11-01
2003-11-04
2003-10-29
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-29
Re: Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
Graham Fawcett
2003-10-30
Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:38:39AM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
>
>>It's still deceptively easy to type some_function('with quotes') in PTL,
>>and have it behave unexpectedly.
>
>
> Right.  I don't think using backticks will help much.

Yeah, you're right. On reflection, adding funky syntax is a poor
solution; that way lies the road to Perl. -1 to my proposal. ;-)

-- G



reply