durusmail: quixote-users: Drop support for Python 2.1?
Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-28
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-28
2003-10-29
2003-10-29
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
Re: Backticks? (was Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?)
2003-10-30
2003-10-30
Doesnt Quixote like CSS?
2003-11-01
2003-11-01
2003-11-04
2003-10-29
Re: Drop support for Python 2.1?
2003-10-29
Drop support for Python 2.1?
Neil Schemenauer
2003-10-30
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:14:28AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Seriously, though, the non-stringness of htmltext is, for me at least, the
> biggest problem with the entire Quixote system.

Your opinion seems to be shared by a lot of other Quixote users.
I'll probably take another stab at the subtype implementation but
not just now.

Right now I'm dreaming of more ambitious plans.  I would like the XML
to escape its string bonds and become a first class PTL citizen.
That means new syntax and that the return values of XML templates
would be some form of tree structure instead of an htmltext object.
The Quixote publisher would serialize the tree before writing it
back to the client.  There could be optional DTD validation and
pretty printing to make debugging easier.

  Neil

reply