durusmail: quixote-users: async HTTP server included?
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-06
A.M. Kuchling
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-06
David Binger
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Jim Dukarm
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Graham Fawcett
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
Jim Dukarm
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Paul Chakravarti
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Etienne Posthumus
Re: Licensing
2004-01-07
A.M. Kuchling
2004-01-07
Tom Jenkins
2004-01-07
A.M. Kuchling
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Etienne Posthumus
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Dave Kuhlman
2004-01-08
Dave Kuhlman
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-08
Mark Bucciarelli
2004-01-08
A.M. Kuchling
2004-01-08
Mark Bucciarelli
2004-01-08
A.M. Kuchling
2004-01-08
Ashish Shrestha
quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-08
Graham Fawcett
quixote.server.medusa
2004-01-08
Jim Dukarm
2004-01-12
O. Moskalenko
Re: quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-13
Graham Fawcett
Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
O. Moskalenko
Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Graham Fawcett
Resolved! Was Re: [Quixote-users] Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
O. Moskalenko
Re: Resolved! Was Re: Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Graham Fawcett
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
Jim Dukarm
2004-01-08
John P Speno
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-08
Skip Montanaro
2004-01-06
Jim Dukarm
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Graham Fawcett
async HTTP server included?
A.M. Kuchling
2004-01-06
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:11:38PM -0500, Graham Fawcett wrote:
> I propose that we adapt and bundle Pierre's code with Quixote as a
> built-in Web server for demo and lightweight use.

Good idea.  What's the license on the code?  And do you want to work up a
patch, or should I do it?

--amk
reply