durusmail: quixote-users: async HTTP server included?
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
2004-01-06
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
Re: Licensing
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-08
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-08
quixote.server.medusa
2004-01-08
2004-01-12
Re: quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-13
Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Resolved! Was Re: [Quixote-users] Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Re: Resolved! Was Re: Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
async HTTP server included?
Jim Dukarm
2004-01-06
---------- Quoth Graham Fawcett: -----------------
> ...I propose that we adapt and bundle Pierre's code with Quixote as a
> built-in Web server for demo and lightweight use....

> ...I think it would be a great benefit to Quixote window-shoppers if they
> could have a Works Out of the Box experience; no SCGI, no Apache
> directives, no Medusa to download. Given the decent scalability of
> async/polling servers, this would provide not just a demo environment
> but should be satisfactory for at least small-scale production use.

This looks like a great idea. I have been happy with using Medusa, but
eliminating from my app a big third-party package, most of which I
still do not understand, is a very attractive proposition.

The benefit is not just to Quixote window-shoppers. A Medusa-like
out-of-the-box server included with Quixote is just what is needed for
intranet applications and for various specialized, self-contained
applications where the user or administrator may not necessarily be
eager or able to set up and manage a general-purpose HTTP server like
Apache. An example would be process or lab instrument monitoring.

I am in the last desparate weeks of a classic Death March project
which is being saved from oblivion by Quixote and its Medusa server.
If Quentel's async http server is made "Quixote-ready," I will be
happy to bolt it under the hood of my app and test it.

Thanks for spotting this, Graham.

Jim Dukarm
DELTA-X RESEARCH
Victoria BC Canada



reply