durusmail: quixote-users: Re: async HTTP server included?
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
2004-01-06
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
Re: Licensing
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-07
2004-01-07
2004-01-08
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-08
quixote.server.medusa
2004-01-08
2004-01-12
Re: quixote.server.medusa (Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server)
2004-01-13
Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Resolved! Was Re: [Quixote-users] Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Re: Resolved! Was Re: Re: Problem with using quixote.server.medusa vs. standalone medusa
2004-01-14
Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
Re: Pipelining the async HTTP server
2004-01-08
2004-01-08
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
2004-01-06
Re: async HTTP server included?
Graham Fawcett
2004-01-07
Paul Chakravarti wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2004, at 4:44 PM, Graham Fawcett wrote :
>
>>
>> BTW, Pierre replied to my e-mail [in private conversation]:
>>
>>> It's very kind of you to ask. I forgot to add a comment in the code
>>> to say
>>> it's published under the same licence as the whole Karrigell framework
>>> (GPL). Anyway, feel free to use it and adapt it as you like, and
>>> include it
>
>     ^^^
>
>>> inside Quixote. If you find bugs in it I'd be glad to know as well !
>>
>>
>> so we are good to go.
>
>
> I don't wish to be pedantic however I wanted to verify that
> incorporating a GPL component into Quixote wasn't going to result in any
> 'viral' issues - the remainder of the Quixote framework appears to be
> under a BSD'ish license.


A fair question, Paul. Of course, as the author, Pierre may grant us rights
(formally or informally) under a separate license or agreement. I'll e-mail
Paul and clarify the matter.

-- Graham




reply