A.M. Kuchling wrote: > It's a neat hack, removes some classes of error such as nesting tags Agreed, but... I feel some misgivings about the whole lot. While it is really cool, and has a certain elegance to it's implementation, I don't think I would ever *choose* to use it (except maybe to play with it). Here's why: I *can't* count on one hand the number of languages I have to work with on a regular basis in order to get goals accomplished. Nevow certainly gets cool points, but the syntax is, while elegant, unlike anything else I have to work with... I can't see a good reason to saddle myself with yet another syntax which in the end, serves primarily to abstract away (or is it obfuscate?) the HTML I'm already very familiar with. It seems that as the number of languages I learn increases, my understanding of programming concepts improves, but my ability to sit down with any given language and be immediately productive decreases. I have difficulty remembering the syntactic idiosyncrasies of that particular language. I may be unique in this regard, but I doubt it. Granted, Nevow is Python, but it looks like it relies far too much on cleverly taking advantage of Python's hooks, than on providing a clean, readable syntax, one of Python's greatest strengths. PTL has a couple of oddities about it, but it does a great job of leaving the HTML looking like what's going to end up in the browser... This is important to me at debug-time. PTL does introduce some strangeness to what is otherwise normal Python syntax, but it really just boils down to two things, (I think) which are easily groked, and don't give me headaches when I look at them. There is one flaw with PTL in my mind, and it relates to the way syntax errors (detected at compile time) are handled, which is, in my experience, not very well. But this may be due to poor implementation on my end, or a quirk of the FastCGI mechanism (which I use)... For example, improperly indented code, or mismatched parenthesis, misplaced colons, etc, can be hard to track down, because it never tells me WHERE it's wrong, only that importing that module failed. .py files don't exhibit the same problem. I've tried looking into this from time to time, but keep getting stymied when trying to understand what actually happens when a module is imported. I haven't heard anyone else complain of this, which makes me think it's a side effect of something else I'm doing (wrongly, perhaps!). Anyway, this has been more of a philosophical writing than a technical one, so I'm gonna shut up now (hopefully without inducing too many flames). I will say that I'm not trying to convince anyone not to use Nevow or that it is "bad", just stating why I don't think I'll ever use it, and that I hope PTL (or something like it) remains in Quixote for the foreseeable future (whether it has a sibling named Nevow, zpt, etc, or not). Reserving the right to change my mind (it is pretty cool!), Jason Sibre