durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Medusa bug or user misunderstanding? [patchfiles]
Medusa bug or user misunderstanding?
2004-01-21
2004-01-21
2004-01-21
Re: Medusa bug or user misunderstanding?
2004-01-21
2004-01-21
2004-01-21
Medusa bug or user misunderstanding?
2004-01-21
2004-01-22
Re: Medusa bug or user misunderstanding? [patch files]
2004-01-22
Jason E. Sibre (3 parts)
Re: Medusa bug or user misunderstanding? [patchfiles]
2004-02-04
2004-02-05
Medusa bug or user misunderstanding?
2004-01-22
2004-01-21
Re: Medusa bug or user misunderstanding? [patchfiles]
Jason E. Sibre
2004-02-04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: quixote-users-bounces+jsibre=chironsys.com@mems-exchange.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:44 AM
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:45:55AM -0600, Jason E. Sibre wrote:
> > Here are some patches I whipped up based on what I'm thinking at this
> > point...
>
> Anyone want to comment on Jason's patches?  I haven't been following
> the debate so I'm not sure about what is the right change.
>
>   Neil

I've been using these patches since I posted them, and things seem Ok so
far...

I'm using Medusa for my current development, but I have a couple existing
apps running on an Apache/FastCGI setup on the same box (using the same
patched Quixote package) and I haven't noticed any problems there, either.
They don't get a lot of traffic (they're on my local setup) but I use them
from time to time.  I haven't done any actual 'testing', mind you.  Just
regular day to day use.

I would feel better if some other people looked over them...

For the convenience of anyone interested, here's a link to the email from
the archive that contains the patches:
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/pipermail/quixote-users/2004-January/002515.ht
ml

Relevant discussion is nearby in the archive.


Jason



reply