durusmail: quixote-users: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe)
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
2004-04-07
Patches for .7a3
2004-04-07
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-08
StaticFile is broken (Quixote-0.7a3, scgi-1.2a2, Apache/1.3.27, FreeBSD 4.7)
2004-04-08
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-21
2004-04-21
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Re: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-08
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-06
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Re: R: [Quixote-users] Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-06
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Neil Schemenauer
2004-04-06
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:49:05PM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> It prompts me to wonder whether there were any decisions made re:
> Quixote 1.0 Road Map at the PyCon BOF?

Unfortunately I missed the BoF.  Here's Andrew's notes:

  http://www.amk.ca/diary/2004/03/25#2004-03-25-2

Andrew and I talked later at the conference and I proposed making
the next release 1.0 and keeping the bigger changes (e.g. publisher
refactoring, new form library) for a 2.0.  It's pretty silly that
Quixote has a version number less than 1 given that people have been
using it seriously for years.

The version 1 release could then become a bug fix only branch.
Hopefully version 2 could be released pretty soon after.  The
refactoring is probably just a matter of sitting down for a few
hours and doing it.  The new form library is in pretty good shape.
The only other major remaining issue for version 2 would be i11n
support.

If anyone has any bug fixes they want in the 1.0 release, now would
be a good time to send them to me.

  Neil


reply