durusmail: quixote-users: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe)
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
2004-04-07
Patches for .7a3
2004-04-07
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-08
StaticFile is broken (Quixote-0.7a3, scgi-1.2a2, Apache/1.3.27, FreeBSD 4.7)
2004-04-08
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-21
2004-04-21
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Re: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-08
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-06
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Re: R: [Quixote-users] Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-06
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Martin Maney
2004-04-07
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:40:37PM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> The merit of this version -- setting aside its verbosity -- is that it
> should help us discriminate between worries about implicitness and
> worries motivated by something else.

It's an ill-considered kluge, IMO, and the choice of a magical tuple or
a magical dictionary for the kluge's implementation makes no real
difference.  Sorry if I wasn't clear about that (probably lost some
explicitness in rewriting it after losing the first, more colorful,
version).

I'm not opposed in principle to solving this within quixote, although I
can't really think of anything I would do with it myself - the places
where I've used _q_lookup are not amenable to any sort of static list
or mapping.

--
Self-pity is like sitting there and peeing your pants:
at first, it's warm and comfy, but pretty soon it gets cold
and then it starts to stink.  - anonymous, as is traditional



reply