durusmail: quixote-users: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe)
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
2004-04-07
Patches for .7a3
2004-04-07
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-08
StaticFile is broken (Quixote-0.7a3, scgi-1.2a2, Apache/1.3.27, FreeBSD 4.7)
2004-04-08
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-21
2004-04-21
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Re: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-08
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-06
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Re: R: [Quixote-users] Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-06
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
Kendall Clark
2004-04-07
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:23:48PM -0500, Martin Maney wrote:

> It's an ill-considered kluge, IMO, and the choice of a magical tuple or
> a magical dictionary for the kluge's implementation makes no real
> difference.

Well, there's nothing useful to say in response to that. Frankly, now
I'm glad you lost the first "more colorful" response! :>

> I'm not opposed in principle to solving this within quixote, although I
> can't really think of anything I would do with it myself

I would like to be able to replace existing sites with Quixote without
breaking lots of URLs unnecessarily. In order to do that today, I have
to misuse _q_lookup or _q_resolve. That sucks.

Best,
Kendall Clark
--
Sometimes it's appropriate, even patriotic, to be ashamed
of your country. -- James Howard Kunstler


reply