On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:49:41PM -0500, Martin Maney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:34:52PM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
> > I would like to be able to replace existing sites with Quixote without
> > breaking lots of URLs unnecessarily. In order to do that today, I have
> > to misuse _q_lookup or _q_resolve. That sucks.
>
> I agree.  I only disagree that misusing _q_exports is any better a
> solution.

Sure. We disagree about it being a misuse. That's good to have clear,
at least.

> Uhm, you *did* read more of the "+1 with bells on" message than you
> quoted, right?  You seem to be ignoring the substance of that, so I'm
> wondering if you overlooked it or if you just don't want to discuss any
> solution other than kluging _q_exports.

I read it. I didn't understand yr _q_map idea, so I didn't follow it
up.

I'm obviously willing to discuss other solutions; I documented all the
existing solutions in the Quixote Cookbook yesterday, which should
attest to my sincerity. :>

I just don't agree that Neil's patch "kluges" _q_exports; I wish you'd
make more of a substantive argument about *that*; so far, near as I
can tell, you've just asserted it. That's fine, of course, but as I
said, it doesn't leave much to say in return.

Best,
Kendall Clark