durusmail: quixote-users: Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe)
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
2004-04-07
Patches for .7a3
2004-04-07
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-08
StaticFile is broken (Quixote-0.7a3, scgi-1.2a2, Apache/1.3.27, FreeBSD 4.7)
2004-04-08
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-21
2004-04-21
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Re: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-08
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-06
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Re: R: [Quixote-users] Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-06
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
Jason E. Sibre
2004-04-07
> Please add links to them to the Wiki 1.0 roadmap page.  (Hm,
> maybe I should
> try to turn on file attachments.)
>

Great idea.  I'll start bundling them up.  In the meantime...

Some of the bug fixes / patches I did for Quixote are dependent on patches
for Medusa.  Do you recall if they've been applied or not?  I don't want to
turn in patches for Quixote that will break without the patched Medusa, when
there is no patched Medusa...

One had to do with being able to set multiple headers in the response with
the same name (eg., for setting multiple cookies), one had to do with
unescaping the URL too soon (in Medusa, rather than in the Qx driver).
There may have been one or two others. I'll have to dig.

Thanks,

Jason




reply