durusmail: quixote-users: twisted performance with quixote.
twisted performance with quixote.
2004-04-09
Jason Sibre (2 parts)
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
Re: twisted performance with quixote.
2004-04-09
2004-04-09
twisted performance with quixote.
Alex Li
2004-04-09
Hi Jason,

I have tried your test.  I run your server script on a P3 700MHz machine.
"twisted" return way faster than both oldqx and newqx.  I think there is a
problem with "newqx" on Opera 7.23 (on both Linux and Windows).  The gif's came
up very very slow at every other reload request.  This did not happen on
"oldqx" or twisted.

I don't really see any big difference between "oldqx" and "newqx" ... but then
I didn't time them accurately (just by looking at Opera's status bar).

Btw, the locator() function return an error on my machine... here is the
traceback...

likwoka@cetus:~/tmp/twistedPerf$ python2.2 run.py oldqx
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "run.py", line 236, in ?
    publisher = Publisher(StaticDirectory(web_root_path, cache_time=6000))
  File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/quixote/util.py", line 175, in
__init__
    raise ValueError, "Path %r is not absolute" % path
ValueError: Path 'test_web_root' is not absolute

Regards,
Alex



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/


reply