durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Patches for .7a3
Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe)
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Bug fixes (was: Illegal Python Names cookbookrecipe)
2004-04-07
Patches for .7a3
2004-04-07
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-08
StaticFile is broken (Quixote-0.7a3, scgi-1.2a2, Apache/1.3.27, FreeBSD 4.7)
2004-04-08
Re: Patches for .7a3
2004-04-21
2004-04-21
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-06
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
Re: Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-08
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-07
2004-04-06
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
2004-04-05
Re: R: [Quixote-users] Illegal Python Names cookbook recipe
2004-04-06
Re: Patches for .7a3
A.M. Kuchling
2004-04-21
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:22:11AM -0500, jsibre@sibre.org wrote:
> I'm not sure the bit about combining the headers (with ",") will work for
> cookies.

Combining multiple cookies into a single Set-Cookie line should work
according to the HTTP and cookie RFCs, but neither Mozilla or Opera seem to
support it; they want separate headers.  (Lynx gets this right, of course.)
If they supported it, the whole multiple-header interface wouldn't be
needed. Grr; I hate browser implementors.

> Btw, are you going to wrap up a new dist of medusa, or shall I just get it
from
> CVS?

I'll wrap up a new release, but want to decide about the unquoting patch
first.  Unfortunately, I'm leaning against it; it might mess things up for
too many Medusa users.  (But I'm still thinking about it...)

--amk


reply