-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Rush wrote: | | Can someone point me to a Quixote-friendly technology that is a | just-add-water quick'n'easy session manager. Quixote looked so simple | so I must be missing something as sessions aren't that exotic of a | requirement. | sessions aren't exotic but scgi uses separate process and sharing data between processes is not quick'n'easy. it seems most people here either use a rdbms or the zodb and so use a sql based or zodb based session manager. but that doesn't mean there aren't other options... something i've been meaning to try is remoteD: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=90707 http://remoted.sourceforge.net/docs.php This basically starts a server that exposes a dict-like interface allowing multiple processes to share a dictionary. also there is a threaded publisher i believe on the wiki. with the threaded publisher each worker would be able to share a single session manager. another option possibly is Pyro http://pyro.sourceforge.net/index.html a google search on python & ipc came up with this hit that i didn't know about: Python Object Sharing, or POSH for short http://poshmodule.sourceforge.net/ if you want to get down and dirty: Python-IPC http://www.xs4all.nl/~walterj//python-ipc/ PyIPC http://www.theory.org/~mac4/software/ hmmmm... there looks to be some serious options here for a solution or two that can be added to the wiki. - -- Tom Jenkins devIS - Development Infostructure http://www.devis.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0-nr2 (Windows XP) Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAvf4qV7Yk9/McDYURAtwfAJ9RJ9oQ2s3xmu4RAN9WpEMJy49+FACfSM3d 6Lk1jHK/RPDWUy/yrpF3L4M= =c5KX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----