durusmail: quixote-users: is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-17
2004-08-17
2004-08-18
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-18
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-18
Re: is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-19
Re: is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-19
Re: is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-19
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-18
2004-08-18
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
2004-08-18
2004-08-20
2004-08-20
[slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
2004-08-23
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
2004-08-24
2004-08-24
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
2004-08-24
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
2004-08-25
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
2004-08-25
Re: [slightly OT] Component frameworks and Inversion of Control Pattern
is anyone working ona task list, bug list, issue tracking type utility
Mario Ruggier
2004-08-18
On Aug 18, 2004, at 12:17 AM, Simon Cusack wrote:

> Maybe we should organise a plug in architecture for commonly used
> website components like this would be helpful.  Anybody thought of
> this?

Every web framework has dreamed of this sooner than later... I would
certainly love to see a quixotic component spec, and if there'd be such
a thing I'd be happy to program against (for ;) it.

mario


reply