On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:32:35AM -0700, Titus Brown wrote:
> -> >Maybe we should organise a plug in architecture for commonly used
> -> >website components like this would be helpful.  Anybody thought of
> -> >this?
> ->
> -> Every web framework has dreamed of this sooner than later... I would
> -> certainly love to see a quixotic component spec, and if there'd be such
> -> a thing I'd be happy to program against (for ;) it.
>
> Perhaps I'm being overly skeptical here -- I hate servlet-style
> bureaucracy ;) -- but the reason I love Quixote so much is that
> it already provides the perfect "component spec" for my needs:
> the Quixote package publication spec is both lightweight and quite
> general.  Why do we need add'l specs?

Where is the "Quixote package publication spec"?  Is it the same as
the "Quixote Programming Overview"?

Or did Titus forget to add a smiley?

Or am I just slow, and Titus is saying that Quixote is clean enough
so that we do not need a component spec?

Dave

[snip]

--
Dave Kuhlman
dkuhlman@rexx.com
http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman